Everyone is deciding about you, in every meeting, from the first week.
The clock is real. So is the fact that nobody will tell you what they have concluded.
Free to start · No credit card
What is actually happening
The standard playbook says listen first, do not change anything for sixty days, find a quick win. It is not wrong and it is not enough, because it treats the period as a performance to get through.
What is actually happening is that thirty or forty people are each forming a private assessment of you, from very little evidence, and those assessments will harden into the reality you work inside for years. Most of them will never be said to your face. The quiet ones set the fastest, and the person who decides early that you are not serious will still be operating on that in year three.
The first ninety days are not a test to survive. They are the one window in which the relationships that will govern your whole tenure can still be deliberately designed.
After that you are not designing them. You are living in them.
What becomes possible
What is available is a set of relationships you chose rather than inherited.
That means knowing, early and specifically, what each person who matters is actually worried about, which is rarely what they say in the first meeting. It means making a small number of clear promises and visibly keeping them, because that is what trust is made of and it compounds from week two. And it means finding the one or two people who will tell you the truth, which is the scarcest thing available to a new executive.
Do that and the quick win arrives on its own. Skip it and the quick win buys you nothing, because nobody has decided yet whether to follow you.
One story
A composite, braided from several people we have worked with. Details are changed.
She came in over a function of sixty people, two internal candidates having been passed over, one of whom now reported to her. Everyone advised her to win him over.
She did the opposite of the advice, and it was the right call. Rather than working on him, she went systematically through everyone who mattered and asked one question in different forms: what is the thing you are worried I will get wrong. The answers were specific and they were not what she expected. Three separate people were worried about the same reorganisation rumour she had never heard of.
The passed-over candidate told her, in week two, that his real concern was not the title. It was that the last two leaders had killed a project he had spent three years on, and he expected her to do the same. That was a completely different conversation than the one she had been preparing.
She made him one narrow, explicit promise about that project, with a date, and kept it. He became the person who told her the truth for the next four years. She says she has run every role since the same way.
To land well, and to build trust faster than the clock runs out.
Bring it something real →Would rather we came to you? Ask us to get in touch, with a line about your situation. A person reads every note, and writes back.